Statement on Covid-19 and Migration Governance in Africa
On Day 12 (24 November 2020) of the ’67th Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)’, maHp project coordinator Associate Professor Jo Vearey presented a joint statement by the African Centre for Migration & Society (ACMS) and the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa (IHRDA), calling on the continent’s responses to Covid-19 to mainstream all forms of migration and all migrant groups. Watch and read the full submission below:
Honorable Chairperson of the Commission, Honorable Commissioners, Colleagues,
State responses to Covid-19 – including extreme lockdowns, border closures, and the resultant restrictions on population movement – have highlighted the essential role human mobility plays in on the continent. As a result, Covid-19 creates a unique opportunity for encouraging states and regional bodies to centre mobility across international borders as part of a more holistic approach to inter- and intra-continental trade, development, and the fulfilment of human rights.
Yet, despite the prevalence of diverse forms of population mobility across the continent, responses to Covid-19 do not adequately engage with migration. Where migration governance responses do exist in the context of Covid-19, they focus on controlling the movement of people and goods across international borders. Ultimately, this involves facilitating the regular transfer of goods and services whilst simultaneously restricting the regular movement of non-citizens across borders. This approach is detrimental to the management of Covid-19 and highlights the prioritisation of protocols for facilitating the movement of goods and services over engaging with protocols that have been developed relating to the movement of people. These responses will further stall the agenda associated with the AU Protocol for the Movement of People.
The response to Covid-19 has also provided states with the opportunity to tighten and restrict the movement of people across borders. Furthermore, in some contexts Covid-19 is being used to legitimise an increasingly securitised response to immigration (i.e. reducing movement). As has been shown in previous research, closing or fortifying borders does not stop movement. Rather, movement across borders continues but becomes more dangerous as greater risks are taken outside of regular channels. This has implications for the safety of individual migrants and for public health generally as people who move irregularly are often left out of disease control mechanisms at Points of Entry. Covid-19 has affected migration routes to Europe with more people moving via the Canary Islands than previously. Migrants are increasingly “stuck” in corridors to (and from) Europe, including those being returned. This has led to an increasing reliance on the use of smugglers and in using new, more dangerous, routes. Key areas of concern include transit camps in Niger at the border with Libya and Algeria.
Currently, Covid-19 disease control responses focus on Points of Entry (PoE), including international airports and major land border crossings. Responses to Covid-19 – including lessons learned from Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) do not include asylum seekers, refugees and IDPs are not prioritised by states. Rather, responses have exacerbated/amplified existing challenges faced by non-citizens, including a reliance on unsafe migratory routes and difficulties in accessing documentation, healthcare and other social welfare systems.
Increased securitisation of immigration may undermine much-needed efforts to develop migration-aware and mobility-competent cross-border, regional health system responses. Therefore, there is a need for caution as the development of (im)migration interventions centred around a securitisation approach may provide opportunities for co-opting components of the global health security movement by using health status (or perceived health risk) as an additional securitisation measure through which to further restrict movement across national borders and/or to justify deportation of non-nationals. These processes risk creating challenges that will further stall progress towards global health goals by undermining attempts to develop coordinated, cross-border, migration-aware and mobility-competent health programmes. Responses risk deterring irregular cross-border migrants from accessing prevention and treatment programmes for both communicable and non-communicable diseases
In order to ensure that the continent “leaves no-one behind”, responses to Covid-19 must mainstream all forms of migration and all migrant groups. This includes those moving within their country of birth as well as those crossing international borders.
To this end, we urge the African Commission to encourage states to:
– Improve processes to generate and utilise real-time migration and mobility data to support the development, implementation and evaluation of appropriate responses that result in safer and unencumbered journeys for all moving on the continent.
– Build on opportunities for positive change, such as the increased coordination of humanitarian responses resulting from responding to Covid-19.
– Encourage local-level coordination. Indeed, developing coordination mechanisms across border areas if undertaken at the local level, can avoid the delays associated with bureaucratic processes at national/sub-national level.
– Support migrant-and refugee-led responses to Covid-19.
– Revise pandemic preparedness plans so that they engage with migration.
African Centre for Migration & Society (ACMS), Wits University
- PRESENTATION: The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on migrants and migration in South Africa - March 22, 2021
- WEBINAR INVITE: Present And Imminent: Crises And Complexity In Mexico And South Africa - February 9, 2021
- VIDEO: Building capacity for research on migration and health - January 26, 2021
- Refugees and migrants are vulnerable to ‘vaccine nationalism’ as host nations put their own citizens first - January 25, 2021
- OP-ED: Vaccine nationalism and migration: Implications for the (mis)management of Covid-19 in South Africa - January 21, 2021
- VIDEO: How the governments can deal with immigration during the Covid-19 pandemic? - January 15, 2021
- PODCAST: Bietbridge humanitarian crisis - January 14, 2021
- OP-ED: Drones, dinghies and an army helicopter – why the state’s new toys won’t help South Africa’s response to Covid-19 - January 14, 2021
- Statement on Covid-19 and Migration Governance in Africa - December 3, 2020
- PODCAST: Why are migrants being excluded from SA’s response to Covid-19? - June 26, 2020